Time for W to answer for his actions

You may not know it, but we are living in the Responsibility Era. So said George Bush back in 2000 when he accepted the Republican presidential nomination. He vowed that he would be the Responsibility President and, it seems, repeat the word over and over until it lost all meaning. That one speech, forgettable but retrievable, contained this line: "And to lead this nation to a responsibility era, a President himself must be responsible." Churchill, rest easy.
In his Sunday night speech, Bush once again ran up this tattered rhetorical banner: "I am responsible for the decision to go into Iraq." It was the exact same phrase Bush had used earlier in the week.

Had the word "responsible," in all its permutations and declensions, made an occasional appearance in the President's rhetoric, it would not be worth a comment. But it is a theme, a beat, a tick, a flatfooted verbal tautology and a way, really, of deflecting apt criticism. Listen to your President:

"I take responsibility," he said Sept. 13 about the botched Hurricane Katrina relief effort. "I take personal responsibility for everything I say, of course," he said back in 2003. "I also take responsibility for making decisions on war and peace."

"I take responsibility for putting our troops into action," he said a bit earlier in 2003. "I take responsibility for making that decision."

This recitation of the obvious is a bit of clumsy rhetorical strutting, but also a way of ducking the ultimate in responsibility: accountability. This is something Bush will not accept or countenance.

It was the same with the intelligence failure that was Bush's prime justification for the war. The President asserts repeatedly that he's responsible for that - but so is Congress. It saw the same intelligence. But it is the President who runs the spy agencies, not Congress, and it is he who ought to be accountable for their dismal performance.

This theme of responsibility without accountability applies in spades to Bush's personnel policies - or lack of them. If the President were truly responsible, then he would fire the bunglers.

By failing to do so, the President shows that he has not closely examined what went wrong. Bush cannot expect a nation, and in particular its military, to accept the assurances of people who will be mocked by history or to have faith in leaders whose failures are sadly obvious in the only ledger that really matters - the body count in Iraq.

If Bush wants us to believe that he truly accepts responsibility for what has happened in Iraq, then he has to act responsibly himself: End the Responsibility Era. Start the Accountability one.